![]() Some studies find that right-to-carry laws reduce violent crime, others find that the effects are negligible, and still others find that such laws increase violent crime. After reviewing many of the studies listed in the table below, the NRC (2004) panel, with one member dissenting, concluded: NRC (2004) reviewed much of the same literature and reanalyzed data that were common to many of these analyses: a panel data set originally spanning 1977–1992, then expanded through 2000. (2005) found insufficient evidence for determining the effect of such laws on violent crime. In their review of existing studies examining shall-issue laws, Hahn et al. Department of Health and Human Services (Hahn et al., 2005)-evaluated this early literature and reached nearly identical conclusions. Two important reviews of the scientific literature on gun policy effects-one by the National Research Council (NRC), a part of the National Academy of Sciences (NRC, 2004), and one by the Community Preventive Services Task Force, established by the U.S. The table below lists studies from this early period of responses to Lott and Mustard (1997), as well as their counter-responses. ![]() Their "more guns, less crime" conclusion was immediately controversial and led to a proliferation of studies exploring the robustness of the study's findings to alternate model specifications and to improvements or expansions to the data series. Using these data, Lott and Mustard (1997) concluded that states implementing shall-issue laws saw significant decreases in rates of violent crime, murder, rape, and assault. An explosion of research into the effects of shall-issue laws on violent crime was triggered in 1997 by the publication of analyses using county-level data from 1977 to 1992. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |